Skip to content
IdeaScore
Solutions · Universities

Run Your Seed Fund Without a Spreadsheet Marathon

Your seed-fund call end to end: the form, a faculty jury and a ranking your governing body can defend.

Students handing in applications at a seed-fund desk on campus
Call day at an institute seed fund: applications handed in at the desk

Who Works in It

  • Innovation cell administrator

    Builds the form once each cycle, opens the window, and triages incoming applications without touching a spreadsheet.

  • Faculty evaluator

    Scores a batch between lectures on a laptop, against a rubric someone else set up, with no software to install.

  • Student or faculty applicant

    Fills a long form across several sittings, uploads a pitch deck, and can see exactly where the application stands.

A Seed-Fund Call, Start to Disbursement

The stages most institute funds already run, now with one system carrying every handoff.

  1. Call opens

    A registration window with a capacity limit and a public link goes out to departments.

  2. Faculty screening

    Reviewers triage for completeness and flag resubmissions from an earlier cohort.

  3. Jury round

    Faculty and invited industry evaluators score against a shared rubric, in their own time.

  4. Pitch day

    Shortlisted teams present live, with a timer and a projector board the room can see.

  5. Disbursement

    The committee report goes to governance and funding follows the ranking it approved.

Collect

One form for the whole institute, built once a cycle

Build a multi-stage form with the fields an institute application needs — team details, stage, a department question for faculty applicants. Attach guidance, set a capacity and closing date; applicants save drafts and resume.

Explore applications
Seed Fund 2026 · Cohort III

Venture

Venture nameShort text
SectorSelect
Stage (TRL)Select
DepartmentSelect
Show when "Applying as" is Faculty
Pitch deckPDF · 20 MB
Evaluate

A ranking your faculty jury can stand behind

Evaluators score against a weighted rubric on their own time. Calibration normalises the strict scorer and the generous one, and a second round can promote only the shortlist forward.

  • Conflict-of-interest declarations before assignment
  • Blind review when identity should not colour a score
  • Human, AI and blended leaderboard views
Explore evaluation

Leaderboard

5 of 126 teams · ranked by human score

  1. 1
    Halcyon Grid
    46.5 / 50
  2. 2
    Quorum Bio
    43 / 50
  3. 3
    Farmlight
    41.5 / 50
  4. 4
    Tessel Labs
    39 / 50
  5. 5
    Orrin Health
    37 / 50
Decide

Pitch day and a report your governing body will accept

Run the live pitch session with a timer and a projector board the room can watch update. Afterwards, export the committee report as Excel or HTML — the same ranking the jury produced, ready for the meeting that approves disbursement.

Explore pitch day and reports
Seed Fund 2026Now pitching

Farmlight

04:32
  • 1Halcyon Grid46.5
  • 2Quorum Bio43
  • 3Farmlight41.5

Committee report

Seed Fund 2026 · .xlsx

Generated 2 min ago

What University Teams Use Most

  • Rubric with weights and descriptors

    The same criteria every evaluator sees, so a governing body can trust the ranking it is handed.

  • Calibration across evaluators

    Z-score normalisation adjusts for a strict examiner sitting next to a generous one.

  • Conditional multi-stage forms

    Ask a question only when it applies — a department field for faculty applicants, a co-founder panel for teams.

  • Resubmission and duplicate detection

    A student reapplying next cohort, or two overlapping team entries, is flagged before anyone reviews it twice.

  • Self-hosting on your own infrastructure

    On Enterprise, on request: our team installs IdeaScore on your servers, applies updates and provides support.

  • Committee Excel export

    A ranked, ready-to-circulate spreadsheet for the governing body meeting, generated on demand.

  • Applicant portal with magic-link sign-in

    No password to lose between sittings; applicants resume a draft and track status from any device.

  • Audit log

    Every approval, rejection and reopened decision is timestamped, for when a department asks why.

Questions Universities Ask

Yes. Self-hosting on your own infrastructure is available on Enterprise, on request: our team installs IdeaScore on your servers, applies updates and provides support. Or run it in our cloud and leave the servers to us.
No installation and nothing to learn beyond opening a link: an evaluator sees a batch of applications, a rubric with descriptors, and a score field. Most reviewers finish their first application without help.
Yes. Programmes are independent inside an organisation, so a seed fund, an innovation-cell grant and a student competition can each keep their own form, evaluators and rubric.
Resubmission and duplicate detection flags a new application that resembles an earlier one, so reviewers see the history before they decide, rather than scoring it cold.

See Your Seed-Fund Call Run in IdeaScore

A 30-minute walkthrough with a product specialist, using your call's form, faculty rubric and rounds.

Students handing in applications at a seed-fund desk on campus
Call day at an institute seed fund: applications handed in at the desk

Who Works in It

  • Innovation cell administrator

    Builds the form once each cycle, opens the window, and triages incoming applications without touching a spreadsheet.

  • Faculty evaluator

    Scores a batch between lectures on a laptop, against a rubric someone else set up, with no software to install.

  • Student or faculty applicant

    Fills a long form across several sittings, uploads a pitch deck, and can see exactly where the application stands.

A Seed-Fund Call, Start to Disbursement

  1. Call opens

    A registration window with a capacity limit and a public link goes out to departments.

  2. Faculty screening

    Reviewers triage for completeness and flag resubmissions from an earlier cohort.

  3. Jury round

    Faculty and invited industry evaluators score against a shared rubric, in their own time.

  4. Pitch day

    Shortlisted teams present live, with a timer and a projector board the room can see.

  5. Disbursement

    The committee report goes to governance and funding follows the ranking it approved.

How IdeaScore Runs It

One form for the whole institute, built once a cycle

Build a multi-stage form with the fields an institute application needs — team details, stage, a department question for faculty applicants. Attach guidance, set a capacity and closing date; applicants save drafts and resume.

Explore applications
Seed Fund 2026 · Cohort III

Venture

Venture nameShort text
SectorSelect
Stage (TRL)Select
DepartmentSelect
Show when "Applying as" is Faculty
Pitch deckPDF · 20 MB
IdeaScore